Tag Archives: Lent

Lent, an idea, and an action

John Petts's Window in the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church (h/t Eye Fetch)

On Sunday 15 September, 1963, just at the end of Sunday school and just as the main Sunday service was about to start, a bomb warning was telephoned in to the Sixteenth Street Baptist church of Birmingham, Alabama. The congregation were given less than three minutes warning. When the bomb exploded, four children were killed: Cynthia Wesley, Carole Robertson and Addie Mae Collins, all 14, and Denise McNair, aged 11. They had all been standing near a mirror, brushing their hair and adjusting their white dresses. Of course, all four girls, like the rest of the church congregation were black. The bombing had been perpetrated by a faction of the Ku Klux Klan in Alabama. It took fourteen years before the first of the bombers, Robert Chambliss, was arrested; 37 years before Thomas Blanton, was jailed, and Frank Cherry wasn’t convicted until 2002.

The atrocity was reported throughout the world, and, perhaps surprisingly, in the small Carmarthenshire village of Llansteffan, a man decided to do something about it. He was John Petts, an artist. Many years later he recalled: “Naturally, as a father, I was horrified by the death of the children. As a craftsman in a meticulous craft, I was horrified by the smashing of all those stained-glass windows. And I thought to myself, my word, what can we do about this?”

Petts’s idea was to set up a fund to replace the windows of the Sixteenth Street Baptist church, a fund to which the maximum contribution could be half a crown: “We don’t want some rich man as a gesture paying the whole window. We want it to be given by the people of Wales.”

The idea took on a life of its own, and money flowed in. There were pictures in the local and national press of children, black and white, queuing to hand their pocket money over. But what form should the window take? Petts puzzled about this:

Then it struck him. A verse from Matthew 25:40Open Link in New Window that spelt out the Christian message of brotherly love: “Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.” Petts employed the last refrain: “You do it me”. Once the words were in place, the image followed. The window was installed in 1965. It showed a black figure, his chest thrust out and arms outstretched as though on a crucifix, the right one pushing away hatred and injustice, the left offering forgiveness. A rainbow, representing racial diversity, arcs over the head. Christ. As a black man. In the South. In the 60s.1

The most impressive thing about the whole story is Petts’s justification for what he did:
An idea doesn’t exist unless you do something about it. Thought has no real living meaning unless it’s followed by action of some kind.

There is a profound triviality about the way in which most Christians approach Lent: observing the holy season is limited to questions of “What I’m going to give up”, and discussions of what you couldn’t bear to live without— chocolate, beer, or Facebook. Every time this conversation takes place, the devil wins, because it is part of the devil’s always successful approach to human sinfulness and fallenness: make it a bit of a joke.

The Church has long recognized the way in which humanity’s fallen nature gets in the way of us taking our fallen nature seriously. This way the Church has developed practices, customs, disciplines, that allow us to do what is right without letting our selfish and lazy selves get in the way. Lent is the time in which the ascetism of the Christian life is most clearly expressed. To live an ascetic life, which is to say, to live a disciplined Christian life, means to take seriously the three-fold practices of almsgiving, prayer and fasting described in the Ash Wednesday Gospel (Matt 6:1-18Open Link in New Window). This three-fold practice covers all the bases, in a Christian ‘triangle’:

  • prayer means focussing on God
  • almsgiving means focussing on others;
  • only fasting focuses on yourself.

How can these three disciplines be the antidote to human fallenness? Let’s take them in reverse order:

  • Fasting means that we recognize our true needs, and don’t confuse “want” with “need”. It helps us to align ourselves away from thinking “Go on, you’re worth it”, and towards our commitments and relationships.
  • This outward commitment is continued in Almsgiving. This is not just “giving money to charity” (although that is good and necessary, for your and for the charities). Almsgiving is any practice of loving compassion and justice-making. It helps us to admit to our standing in the world and demonstrates what we truly value— not our possessions, reputation and achievement, but our involvement with others.
  • Prayer, which includes all the other “acts of the virtue of religion”— adoration, devotion, sacrifice, study and meditation— sustains our relationship with God and helps us understand fully what it means to say that it is in God we live and move and have our being (Acts 17:28Open Link in New Window).

In Lent we undertake these disciplines in the hope that the benefits they bring will take deeper root in our hearts and lives. It is important that we observe all three, for only then are we living within the reality identified by Jesus in the great commandment: you must love the Lord your God, and your neighbour as yourself.2

John Petts said:

An idea doesn’t exist unless you do something about it. Thought has no real living meaning unless it’s followed by action of some kind.

Lent doesn’t exist unless you do something about it.
Your Christian faith had no real living meaning unless it’s expressed by action of some kind.

To follow a holy Lent, a Lent in which the ascetic practices of the Church are taken seriously, gives you an opportunity to do this, to live as a disciple of Christ, and not as a hypocrite. God give us strength and grace to do so.

  1. from Gary Younge “American civil rights: the Welsh connection” www.guardian.co.uk p12 of the G2 section of the Guardian on Monday 7 March 2011 http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2011/mar/06/racist-attack-alabama-1963-gary-younge []
  2. based on the wonderful injunction from the Godzdogz blog: http://godzdogz.op.org/ []

CofT : Circle 3 Temperaments



Circles of ThornsThe ideas in Circles of Thorns are being explored in Canterbury in the form of two lectures. If you would like to follow the themes and structure of Circles of Thorns in your own Lenten study, then please feel free to:

  • listen to the podcasts. The Sunday evening sermons (c 20 mins) and the Tuesday lunchtime Lent lectures (c 40 mins) will appear the day (DV) after delivery.
  • use this series of thoughts, readings, meditations and questions. A PDF can also be downloaded for easier printing and later reference.

Circle 3 / Week 3 / Temperaments

Declare the past, diagnose the present, foretell the future; practice these acts. As to diseases make a habit of two things— help, or at least to do no harm. The art has three factors— the disease, the patient, the physician. The physician is the servant of the art. The patient must co-operate with the physician in combatting the disease.

Epidemics, I.11 (c C5th BC?)
How useful is this definition of medicine and medical treatment today? Does it apply to our understanding of mental / psychological health?

Bloodletting was a vital part of ancient and medieval medicine. It was unthinkable to be a doctor or a patient without dealing with bloodletting. As a medieval doctor wrote:

Phlebotomy clears the mind, strengthens the memory, cleanses “the stomach, dries up the brain, warms the marrow, sharpens the hearing, stops tears, encourages discrimination, develops the senses, promotes digestions, produces a musical voice, dispels torpor, drives away anxiety, feeds the blood, rids it of poisonous matter, and brings long life.

Can you think of any idea or practice of our own day, perhaps something which you put great store by, which might one day be discarded as phlebotomy has been?

Humoral medicine gives us four temperaments (character types) determined by the influence action of four different substances in the body:

Choleric people are governed by the yellow bile produced by the liver: “They are naturally quick witted bold, no way shame-faced, furious, hasty, quarrelsome, fraudulent.” (Nicholas Culpeper). Melancholic people are governed by black bile: they are “… dull, sad, sowre, lumpish, ill disposed, solitary, any way moved, or displeased. And from these Melancholy Dispositions, no man living is free, no Stoicke, none so wise, none so happy, none so patient, so generous, so godly, so divine, that can vindicate himselfe; so well composed, but more or lesse some time or other, he feeles the smart of it. Melancholy in this sense is the Character of Mortalitie.” (Robert Burton). Sanguine people are governed by blood. They are: “…merry, cheerful creatures, bountiful, pitiful, merciful, courteous, bold, trusty…A little thing will make them weep, but soon as ‘tis over, no further grief sticks to their hearts. (Culpepper). Phlegmatic people are governed by phlegm produced in the brains and lungs. They are “cowardly, forgetful creatures” (Culpeper), “Content in knowledge to take little share / To put themselves to any pain most loath. / So dead their spirits, so dull their senses are…” (John Harington).

A leading question— which one are you?

Think of Myers-Briggs and Keirsey and other representatives of the personality development industry. Look at the self-help shelves in your local Waterstone’s. Look at the personal development books bought by the Bridget and Barry Joneses of our day: Who Moved My Cheese?, The Cosmic Ordering Service, Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus, Women Who Run with the Wolves: Contacting the Power of the Wild Woman. These books are about us understanding who we are, really, and then celebrating that: “I’m OK, You’re OK”.

In what ways is this self-help message contradicted by orthodox Christianity?

The four human temperaments, the four ages of man, the four seasons. All four crowd around Christ, and are part of his suffering. Bosch is showing us how it is not just one type of person who is responsible for Christ’s Passion, the ‘evil’ person, the ‘wicked’ person, the person ‘not like us’. Rather, he says, it is all people who are culpable: you, them, me.

Is this really so?


Questions for further reflection

  1. Is the Church too sanguine to let the wicked things happen in the world, even to the extent of allowing Christ to suffer his Passion again, all for the sake of popularity and preoccupation?
  2. Do you find the insights of psychologists a help or a threat to your faith?
  3. If a psychological understanding of Christianity point us to transform and be transformed, how can we achieve this?

  Lenten Study Guide for Circles of Thorns: Week 3 (48.2 KiB, 70 hits)
You need to be a registered user to download this file.



This is part of a series of posts. Others in the series are:—
  1. Circles of Thorns in Lent
  2. CofT : Circle 1 Politics
  3. CofT : Circle 2 Elements
  4. CofT : Circle 3 Temperaments
  5. CofT : Circle 4 Devotions
  6. CofT : Circle 5 Quiddity


CofT : Circle 2 Elements



Circles of ThornsThe ideas in Circles of Thorns are being explored in Canterbury in the form of two lectures. If you would like to follow the themes and structure of Circles of Thorns in your own Lenten study, then please feel free to:

  • listen to the podcasts. The Sunday evening sermons (c 20 mins) and the Tuesday lunchtime Lent lectures (c 40 mins) will appear the day (DV) after delivery.
  • use this series of thoughts, readings, meditations and questions. A PDF can also be downloaded for easier printing and later reference.

Circle 2 / Week 2 / Elements

It is indeed, marvellous that science should ever have revived amid the fearful obstacles theologians cast in her way. Together with a system of biblical interpretation so stringent, and at the same time so capricious, that it infallibly came into collision with every discovery that was not in accordance with the unaided judgement of the senses, and therefore with the familiar expressions of the Jewish writers, everything was done to cultivate a habit of thought the direct opposite of the habits of science. The constant exaltation of blind faith, the countless miracles, the childish legends, all produced a condition of besotted ignorance, of grovelling and trembling credulity that can scarcely be parallelled except among the most degraded barbarians.

William Lecky, The History of the Rise and Influence of the Spirit of Rationalism (1865)

How much does the usual story of the warfare between science and religion affect you? Do you think science and scientific discoveries should inform your faith? Do you think science threatens religion, or your faith?

Usually even a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and the other elements of this world, about the motion and orbit of the stars and even their size and relative positions, about the predictable eclipses of the sun and the moon, the cycles of the years and the seasons, about the kinds of animals, shrubs, stones, and so forth, and this knowledge he holds to as being certain from reason and experience. Now, it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics; and we should take all means to prevent such an embarrassing situation, in which people show up vast ignorance in a Christian and laugh it to scorn.

St Augustine of Hippo, The Literal Meaning of Genesis, e. C5th AD

What science do you think is necessary for the believer to know? Are you comfortable with Christian leaders or believers “talking nonsense” about science?

In medieval science the fundamental concept was that of certain sympathies, antipathies, and strivings inherent in matter itself. Everything has its right place, its home, the region that suits it, and, if not forcibly restrained, moves thither by a sort of homing instinct.

C. S. Lewis, The Discarded Image (1964)

In what ways does Chaucer’s “kyndely enclyning” of creation still find expression today?

The universe is genuinely mysterious, grand, beautiful, awe-inspiring. The kinds of views of the universe which religious people have traditionally embraced have been puny, pathetic, and measly in comparison to the way the universe actually is. The universe presented by organised religions is a poky little medieval universe, and extremely limited.

Richard Dawkins, ‘A Survival Machine’ (1996)

What works of art, religious or otherwise, do you know which express a “genuinely, mysterious, grand, beautiful, awe-inspiring” view of the universe. Is it a film, a book, a painting, a photograph, a piece of music? What moves you, and why?


Questions for further reflection

  1. Do you think it is important for Christian believers to understand the latest scientific discoveries?
  2. Is it possible to be a Christian and a scientist?
  3. Should Christians ever oppose the consequences of scientific discoveries? If so, on what should the opposition be based?
  4. Theology was once called the “Queen of Sciences”. Does it still have something to teach science today?
  5. C. S. Lewis said “astrology was a hard-headed, stern, anti-idealistic affair; the creed of men who wanted a universe which admitted no incalculables.” In what way is this similar to the role of science in our society today?

  Lenten Study Guide for Circles of Thorns: Week 2 (42.6 KiB, 73 hits)
You need to be a registered user to download this file.



This is part of a series of posts. Others in the series are:—
  1. Circles of Thorns in Lent
  2. CofT : Circle 1 Politics
  3. CofT : Circle 2 Elements
  4. CofT : Circle 3 Temperaments
  5. CofT : Circle 4 Devotions
  6. CofT : Circle 5 Quiddity


CofT : Circle 1 Politics



Circles of ThornsThe ideas in Circles of Thorns are being explored in Canterbury in the form of two lectures. One, a sermon, delivered in St Stephen’s Church, on the Sunday evenings of Lent; the other, longer version, a lecture as part of the Canterbury City Centre Parish Lent Lectures, delivered in St Peter’s Church on Tuesday lunchtimes. The first will be about 20 minutes in length, the second about 40 minutes. Audio versions will be posted by the morning following delivery. Feel free to listen to either or both of them!


Circle 1 / Week 1 / Politics

Sometimes we are told that politics is the realistic science: there is no room for naivety or sentiment in working the art of the possible. We are told this, usually, when something unpleasant or unethical is about to be done in our name. Our liberties, our way of life, our system of government, is dependent on violent things being done by violent people. Bosch here shows the government of his day as good as complicit in Christ’s torture, and he refuses to allow us to look away. We can’t afford the moral luxury of proclaiming “not in my name” and thinking that lets us off the hook. Bosch here tells us that there is no neutral place to stand, no safe haven, when it comes to the ways of the world. The men and systems we look to for our protection may be the ones perpetuating the violence. As Bob Dylan wrote “We live in a political world / Love don’t have any place. We’re living in times where men commit crimes / And crime don’t have a face”.

How are we to be followers of Christ in such a world?

The Church has been responsible for much suffering in its long existence. It is a body made up of people, with a powerful idea at its heart. Any powerful idea is open to corruption, and the actions of the Church have, on occasions, been corrupting. Very rarely has these actions been the result of knowing wickedness. Even the witch-burners thought they were doing good, protecting their Church and their society from evil-doers. We can see the wickedness in the actions of our ancestors. Will our descendants look at our beliefs and behaviour and think that we were as corrupt as any? In what ways are we like the dark man, pretending a compassion for Jesus and his world, and yet behaving in ways that continue the crucifixion?

In what ways do we draw a tighter, harder, narrower circle of Christ’s love? In what ways do we use the Crown of thorns as a weapon?

If God is talking to you, too, Mr Cameron – don’t listen… If today the Church of England is wishy-washy and middle-of-the-road, that is no accident. It is the long-term result of Elizabeth [I]’s design. Britain has benefited enormously from a weak clergy that has mainly remained aloft from politics. Britain’s established church, headed by the monarch, has made few demands of our leaders or people… men of power who take instruction from unseen forces are essentially fanatics… theocrats, religious leaders or fanatics citing holy texts dictate violent actions. That constitutes the greatest threat to world peace today.
Michael Portillo, The Sunday Times, 25 February 2007

In what ways is Michael Portillo right? In what ways is he wrong? Does it depend merely on personal preference?

How do we live, as true to our religious and cultural heritage, when those who are “other” no longer live outside our borders, but among us, as part of us, as Europeans?


Questions for further reflection

  1. Is it possible to think of Christ’s Passion continuing into Bosch’s day or even our own times? If not, why not?
  2. If we can think of Christ’s mocking continuing in our own day, who would you place in the position of the four tormentors?
  3. What does your choice of tormentor say about your relationship with Jesus: who do you need to protect him from?
  4. Do the political choices you make add to Christ’s mocking? Which tormentor are you?

  Lenten Study Guide for Circles of Thorns: Week 1 (45.1 KiB, 103 hits)
You need to be a registered user to download this file.



This is part of a series of posts. Others in the series are:—
  1. Circles of Thorns in Lent
  2. CofT : Circle 1 Politics
  3. CofT : Circle 2 Elements
  4. CofT : Circle 3 Temperaments
  5. CofT : Circle 4 Devotions
  6. CofT : Circle 5 Quiddity


Circles of Thorns in Lent



Circles of ThornsAlthough Circles of Thorns was not written as a Lent book, it has ended up being published as the Mowbrays Lent book for 2009, and the five “circles” of the book’s examination of Christ Mocked by Hieronymus Bosch can be easily applied to the five weeks of Lent.

In case there is anyone who is interested in keeping the “observance of a holy Lent, by self-examination and repentance; by prayer, fasting, and self-denial; and by reading and meditating on God’s holy word” (in the words of the Ash Wednesday service of the Church of England), and would like to do so using the structure of Circles of Thorns, I will attach a series of thoughts, readings, meditations and questions. A new set will appear each Wednesday in Lent.

A PDF can also be downloaded for easier printing and later reference. Podcasts (audio files) of the Sunday evening sermons and the Tuesday lunchtime Lent lectures will also appear the day (DV) after delivery.



This is part of a series of posts. Others in the series are:—
  1. Circles of Thorns in Lent
  2. CofT : Circle 1 Politics
  3. CofT : Circle 2 Elements
  4. CofT : Circle 3 Temperaments
  5. CofT : Circle 4 Devotions
  6. CofT : Circle 5 Quiddity


Beatitudes : Peace and Persecution



Life Attitudes

Consider these questions. (You don’t have to write an essay, but just think through what your answers might be.)

  • Pilate asked Jesus ‘what is truth?’ What answer would Jesus give if Pilate asked him ‘what is peace?’ What answer would you give? Pilate?

Bible Work Read through Matthew 5:9-10Open Link in New Window (either alone or as a group). As you read, look at the notes you made when you read the Beatitudes during the first week:

  • !! for that which makes you think;
  • :) those things you agree with, or approve of;
  • :( those things you find difficult to believe or understand;
  • ?? those things which require you to go a little bit further.

Read this story of the Desert Fathers:

  • There were three friends who were eager workers, and one of them chose to devote himself to making peace between people who were fighting, in accordance with ‘Blessed are the peacemakers’. The second chose to visit the sick. The third went off to live in tranquillity in the desert. The first toiled away at the quarrels of men, but could not resolve them all, and so, in discouragement, went to the one who was looking after the sick, and he found him flagging too, not succeeding in fulfilling the commandment. So the two of them agreed to go and visit the one who was living in the desert. They told him their difficulties and asked him to tell them what he had been able to do. He was silent for a time, then he poured water into a bowl and said to them, ‘Look at the water.’ It was all turbulent. A little later he told them to look at it again, and see how the water had settled down. When they looked at it, they saw their own faces as in a mirror. Then he said to them, ‘In the same way a man who is living in the midst of men does not see his own sins because of all the disturbance, but if he becomes tranquil, especially in the desert, then he can see his own shortcomings.’ (Retold by Simon Tugwell)

Can you answer these questions?

  • Why is peacemaking so important to God?
  • What do you make of the story of the Desert Fathers? Whose part would you take?
  • How and where could you ‘make peace’?
  • Look at Jesus’s ‘cleansing the temple’ in Matthew 21:10-16Open Link in New Window. Is Jesus a peacemaker here?

Read this passage:

  • Persecution is an embarrassment to Western Christians; or rather, the lack of it is. There is so much in the scriptures that prepares the disciples for a rough ride, for suffering and pain in this world, that when it does not happen we are thrown by the experience. Are we simply not worth persecuting, we wonder? (Robert Warren, Living Well, 1988))
  • Are we worth persecuting?
  • How do we discern when hostility is ‘persecution’ and when it is deserved censure?
  • What one thing might God be calling you to do that goes against the flow?
  • How can we respond to the sufferings of persecuted Christians elsewhere in the world?

Vangelis : A Way – from the album ‘Heaven and Hell’ (1975); Evangelos Odysseas Papathanassiou (b.1943)

Vangelis, most famous in this country for his score for Chariots of Fire, is a Greek-born electronic and classical composer. Although recently working in an orchestral medium, his early characteristic albums consist of elaborately recorded layers of keyboards, treated synthesisers and “soundscapes” that, with a finely developed sense of melody and mood, work supremely well with applied visuals: hence his popularity with film makers. A Way is the final movement from his early concept album, Heaven and Hell (released in 1975) which resolves the conflict and turmoil of the earlier themes.

What music would you normally choose to listen to for a peaceful time? What other art forms bring you or others peace?




Beatitudes : Mercy and Purity



Life Attitudes

Consider these questions. (You don’t have to write an essay, but just think through what your answers might be.)

  • How do you like to be treated? Do you treat others in the same way?

Bible Work Read through Matthew 5:7-8Open Link in New Window (either alone or as a group). As you read, look at the notes you made when you read the Beatitudes during the first week:

  • !! for that which makes you think;
  • :) those things you agree with, or approve of;
  • :( those things you find difficult to believe or understand;
  • ?? those things which require you to go a little bit further.

A note to help you:
For most modern readers ‘heart’ is the symbolic source of our emotions, and so “pure in heart” is to do with having the right feelings. In the ancient world ‘heart’ more often stood for ‘the inner person’, your mind and your will. “The heart is a symbol of what we are in ourselves, of the source of all our reactions and aspirations. ‘Blessed are the pure in heart’ will mean something like ‘Blessed are those who have a pure source of life in them.’ (Simon Tugwell).
Can you answer these questions?

  • Is pure the same as ‘nice’?
  • What is the connection between purity of heart and seeing clearly?
  • Is it naïve to see the best and the possible in people and situations?
  • Simon Tugwell has given his definition of ‘purity of heart’. What is yours?
  • What do you think of Shakespeare’s famous passage on mercy?

The quality of mercy is not strained,
It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
Upon the place beneath. It is twice blest,
It blesseth him that gives and him that takes.
Portia, The Merchant of Venice, Act IV Scene I

  • Does showing mercy encourage people to take advantage of you?
  • How and where have you experienced mercy?
  • Should governments demonstrate mercy? How?
  • Twice, in Matthew 9:13Open Link in New Window and Matthew 12:7Open Link in New Window, Jesus quotes Hosea’s cry that God desires ‘mercy not sacrifice’. Why is this so important to Jesus?

Royal Concertgebouw Orchestra; Charlotte Margiono, Barbara Bonney, Thomas Hampson, Anton Scharinger; Nicholas Harnoncourt (cond) : “Contessa, perdonno” (Finale) – The Marriage of Figaro (1786); Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, (1756-1791)

The Marriage of Figaro was a controversial choice for Mozart to turn into an opera. The play upon which is was based, by the French playwright Beaumarchais, had caused rioting when it was performed in Paris after being banned for six years by Louis XIV: the king had uttered the prophetic warning: “For this play not to be a danger, the Bastille would have to be torn down first”. Five years after the play’s first performance in Paris that is exactly what happened. The play was also banned in Vienna, where the brother of Louis’s wife (Marie Antoinette) was Emperor, but the Emperor was persuaded by Mozart (and his librettist, da Ponte) that the vicious satire which characterised Beaumarchais’s play would be removed.

The first performance of The Marriage of Figaro was vividly recreated in Peter Schaffar’s play Amadeus, later filmed by Milos Forman. In it Mozart’s great rival Salieri is portrayed as the only person able to realise the genius of the opera, that God is speaking to the world through the music of Mozart. This is what Salieri says of the final scene of The Marriage of Figaro (our music clip):

The fourth [act] was astounding. l saw a woman disguised in her maid’s clothes, hear her husband speak the first tender words he’d offered her in years. Simply because he thinks she is someone else. l heard the music of true forgiveness filling the theatre conferring on all who sat there perfect absolution. God was singing through this little man to all the world. Unstoppable.

What is sung

Contessa, perdono!Più docile io sono, e dico di sì.Ah, tutti contenti saremo così.
Questo giorno di tormenti,
di capricci, e di follia,
in contenti e in allegria
solo amor può terminar.
Sposi, amici, al ballo, al gioco,
alle mine date foco!
Ed al suon di lieta marcia
corriam tutti a festeggiar!
My Countess, forgive me.I am kinder: I will say “Yes.”Then let us all be happy.
This day of torment,
Of caprices and folly,
Love can end
Only in contentment and joy.
Lovers and friends,
let’s round things off
In dancing and pleasure,
And to the sound of a gay march
Let’s hasten to the revelry.

Has any other piece of music ever moved you to see God at work through its composer?




Beatitudes : The Meek, the Hungry, and the Thirsty



Life Attitudes

Consider this question. (You don’t have to write an essay, but just think through what your answer might be.)

  • What is the single most satisfying thing in your life?

Bible Work Read through Matthew 5:5-6Open Link in New Window (either alone or as a group). As you read, look at the notes you made when you read the Beatitudes during the first week:

  • !! for that which makes you think;
  • :) those things you agree with, or approve of;
  • :( those things you find difficult to believe or understand;
  • ?? those things which require you to go a little bit further.

Can you answer these questions?

  • How would you define the quality of ‘meekness’?
  • Is Jesus encouraging us to be wimps?
  • How is meekness different from being amenable and undemanding?
  • What does it mean to ‘inherit the earth’?
  • Do you have any sympathy with the attitudes shown in this passage from Monty Python’s Life of Brian? It shows the group at the back of the crowd listening to the Sermon on the Mount. They can’t hear Jesus’s speech very well:

MAN 2: You hear that? Blessed are the Greek.
GREGORY: The Greek?
MAN 2: Mmm. Well, apparently, he’s going to inherit the earth.
GREGORY: Did anyone catch his name?
MRS. BIG NOSE: You’re not going to thump anybody.
MR. BIG NOSE: I’ll thump him if he calls me ‘Big Nose’ again.
MR. CHEEKY: Oh, shut up, Big Nose.
MR. BIG NOSE: Ah! All right. I warned you. I really will slug you so hard–
MRS. BIG NOSE: Oh, it’s the meek! Blessed are the meek! Oh, that’s nice, isn’t it? I’m glad they’re getting something, ‘cause they have a hell of a time.

  • What is the difference between righteousness and self-righteousness?
  • How does Isaiah 58:6-8Open Link in New Window affect your understanding of ‘righteousness’?

What do you think of this quotation:

  • It is all too easy for us to treat the Pharisees as embodying all that is worst in humankind. But in fact they were most probably the best men of their time, the most religious, the most devoted to the will of God, the most eager to express their loyalty to him in obedience to his every word, the most determined never to compromise with the world around them. But as St Paul came to see it in retrospect, they were exposed to a fatal flaw: the trouble with their outstanding righteousness was that, all too easily, it could be viewed precisely as their righteousness. It was a righteousness that could be measured, so that, at a certain point, you could say that you had now achieved it. This meant it could all too easily come adrift from the original inspiration in devotion to God and become self-sufficient, an end in itself. Simon Tugwell : Reflections on the Beatitudes (1980)

Polyphony : The Beatitudes (1990); Arvo Pärt (b.1935)

Born in 1935, in Estonia, Arvo Pärt first won recognition as a composer in the late 1950s by writing a cantata for children’s choir and orchestra. In 1968 he wrote Credo for piano, mixed chorus, and orchestra; it was banned in the Soviet Union because of its religious text. While in a period of internal exile, Pärt immersed himself in the study of Gregorian chant and Orthodox liturgical music. He began to write using a tonal technique he called ‘tintinnabuli’, in which he surrounded a melodic phrase with triadic notes sounding like bells ringing. A number of large scale choral works were swiftly considered to be modern classics.
The Beatitudes was the first work Pärt composed to an English text, and it was written for the RIAS Chamber Choir in Berlin. Pärt has composed his music carefully, with an ear to the rhythms and syntax of the English version of the verses from Matthew’s Gospel: he uses note lengths to emphasise significant texts. The piece gradually builds in volume and intensity, climaxing in a sung ‘Amen’ (thus taking the piece from the concert hall and into the Church). Pärt begins to explore the consequences of the Beatitudes with an organ postlude, which, working on the themes of the sung passages gently fades away into eternity.
How does the organ playing affect the piece? How does the composer set the different Beatitudes? What difference does his choice of arrangement (melody, harmony, volume, voices) make to your appreciation of each Beatitude? The whole?